With James sunning himself in Cornwall I had arranged my pile of two player games on the table. In Paul's weakened state he couldn't offer any real resistance to my feigned indifference to playing Agricola. Hurrah!
We elected to have the 7 occupations and minor improvements dealt to us with no options because the task of looking through them all took long enough as it is. Paul was claiming rustiness but we both knew the Smith kids had done their work. To be fair I had had a couple of goes on the new iPad version and therefore strategy was fresher in my mind. Two player Agricola has a nasty side effect of making you think you are good at the game. There's plentiful resources to be had (Especially as I had laid out the 4 extra 3 player cards by mistake) and it becomes an exercise in who can cover every base the best. In relative terms we raced through the game with Paul never coming to terms with feeding his family having neglected to build a cooker that converted animals.
Chris - 54
Paul - 35
Another one of my green tinged photos showing the end board of game 2 |
Then to my great surprise Paul announced that he would like to play again. Surely we couldn't fit two games in? You betcha! This time we decided to select 7 from 10 of the additional cards. We had spent most of the first game bitching about our useless god given cards. This time we would have to bitch at ourselves. Second time round Paul was right in the swing of it. Fireplace, pastures, ploughed fields, grain, and grazing animals all embedded whilst I was getting all excited by the grocer occupation I had just played which gave me a little tower of about 7 resources that I could buy for one food each.
Piles and piles of resources stacked up, in fact at the end of the game 23 pieces of clay were sitting there unclaimed (Another problem with putting the extra cards down). The game came down to the wire with the difference being that I had taken advantage of my Axe, renovator, conservator combination to upgrade my rooms to stone, whereas Paul had ploughed fields a plenty sitting fallow.
Chris - 42
Paul - 34
We almost played Agricola on Friday. With Adam. I can't remember what made us change to Macao now... I'm beginning to feel though we should just play it so Adam (or perhaps Joe) can get the win and we can all move on.
ReplyDeleteI'm playing catch up. I didn't get to play it hardly at all when everybody was into it. I just think it's a brilliant, varied, highly replayable game.
ReplyDeleteIt is brilliant. But I'm not sure there's another game where it feels like the winner (Adam (or Joe)) is so pre-ordained.
ReplyDeleteYou know, the advantage of being Adam is so huge that I'm surprised they didn't pick up on it during play-testing.
ReplyDeleteI think Alhambra runs it close...
ReplyDeleteJust for you stat fans the score on Agricola (according to a search of the blog) for the Bristol crowd since 2010 is:
Adam one win
Sam one win
For Alhambra it is:
Sam 8 wins
Joe 2 wins
Andrew 3 wins
Adam 1 win
Lies, damn lies...
ReplyDeleteI'm pretty sure you weren't involved in that game of Agricola Adam!
but yeah, I do fancy my chances at Alhambra
ReplyDeleteWhat's your Bibilios stats as well Sam. You are like the king of that (Although didn't you lose the last one?) I always did fairly well at El Grande although I only have my own anecdotal evidence for that.
ReplyDeleteI can come second with ease at any game
Biblios stats are pretty good although yes, I totally tanked last time out (on letters! I coulda won!)
ReplyDeleteEl Grande - I would concur. I don't think I won that a great deal.